查看完整版本: 三封抗议的email已经登到校报上了。

马甲 2008-4-3 11:32 AM

三封抗议的email已经登到校报上了。

谢谢这些朋友的努力。<img smilieid="48" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/default/00000247.gif" border="0"><br>大家加油写,团结起来声音大。<img smilieid="44" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/default/00000335.gif" border="0"><br><br><br>From aaaa<br>Dear Editor:<br> I was and am very very upset to read the article about
Tibetan situation in yesterday's daily collegian. As far as I know, the
situation in Tibet is a riot rather than a so-called "parade". The
rioters killed so many innocent peoples, one of them is just a
five-year-old kid. I don't think any country in this world will allow
this kind of riot without any response. I think the one who should be
blamed is not Chinese government, it is the RIOTERS! I do not know
where did the author get all those informations, and I strongly
recommend him (her) to talk with someone from China before writing this
kind of article. There are almost one thousand Chinese  students
working or studying in UMASS Amherst, I am sure everybody will be very
happy to tell him(her) why Tibet is part of China, and what's the real
situation in Tibet now.<br>Again, I am very upset of The Daily
Collegian for publishing such an extreme article without further
investigations. I believe that gave most of the Chinese students,
faculties and staffs a very bad impression of The Collegian Daily.<br>Best<br><br><br>From Huajie<br><div>Dear editors,</div><div> </div><div> </div>I am writing to address a problem about your 3/31 news about Tibet: <br><div> </div><a href="http://www.dailycollegian.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&amp;ustory_id=afc4646e-7c8e-447b-af0d-22766fdf5e09&amp;page=2" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://www.dailycollegian.com<wbr>/home/index.cfm?event=displayAr<wbr>ticle&amp;ustory_id=afc4646e-7c8e<wbr>-447b-af0d-22766fdf5e09&amp;page=2</a><div> </div><div> </div><b><font color="#ff0000">Obvious bias and missing of information</font></b><br><div>makes me really angry about your news. Being the most influencial<br>newspaper in Umass and also New England colleges, I respect a lot of<br>your work, completeness of report and political justice. </div><br><div> </div>However, this article disappoints me greatly by speaking<br><div>completely for one side!!! Your news ignores the fact that the crisis<br>in Tibet has complicated history background and this issue cannot be<br>simply viewed just from some limited voices, newspapers, especially<br>CNN. If you just go to <a href="http://youtube.com/" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">youtube.com</a> you'll find tons of other side of this crisis. </div><div> </div>So, please interview more people, more voices before you write<br><div>those articles. Even if you don't mean to select a specific political<br>part to join, you already offended a lot of Chinese students and<br>scholars by the ridiculous INFORMATION ASYMMETRY!</div><div> </div>Sorry if my words displease you. I just want you to understand how<br><div>we feel about this article and our country. I don't want to argue with<br>you who is right and who is wrong here, because it's a long story and<br>it's a story involves too much conspiracy we may not know and convince<br>each other. Also, I don't want to say, it's our own business and no<br>country is qualified to judge since it's an open world, and everyone<br>could speak his own opinion. </div><div> </div>Therefore, my opinion is, you should let people know more about China, and Tibet problem. BUT PLEASE, keep your <font color="#ff0000"><b>elementary EQUITY</b></font>, which is the BASIC JOB of newspaper and media industry.<div> </div><div> </div>Thanks for reading.<br><div> </div><br><div> </div>Cheers,<br><div><br><br><br>From  Leo Gao:<br>Having spent my Ph.D period at Amherst, I know what a liberal place
Amherst is and I have also talked/debated with many of tibetan fellows.
But this matter is everything but being liberal!!! <br>
<br> A simple fact an one year (maybe not one but five I suppose) old
kid could see China has brought Tibet from slavery to modernization,
the majority of the people are better off now. Many (or most) of people
who now reside oversea and make fuss on the issue because they were the
slave owners and the noble group and deprived of their previlige. The
others are some idealists and naive and simple-minded people who don't
really know much about the history but told and used by those people
with agenda. It is absurdly funny and sad to see so many kind and
innocent western people to stand with them without efforts to knowing
the truth/history behind the matter. <br>
<br> I have had understanding/sympathy for Tibet. And I have to admit
that there is much to be improved from the Central Gov part. Having
said that, I feel this free tibet movement is nothing but absurd. I am
completely appalled and DISGUSTED by the current move from oversea
"so-called" Tibetan and the sheer media distortion on it. For the first
time in my life, I have so be with the central Gov on the issue. If I
may give some of you a pieace of my mind, in particular those media
professions if you consider yourself (qualified?) as one of them, do
your homework and know what you are talking about before you
speak/comment on a matter of such gravity. Or simply Keep one's mouth
shut instead of showing the ignorance.<br><img smilieid="44" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/default/00000335.gif" border="0"><img smilieid="44" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/default/00000335.gif" border="0"><img smilieid="44" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/default/00000335.gif" border="0"><br></div><br>

[[i] 本帖最后由 马甲 于 2008-4-3 12:34 PM 编辑 [/i]]

chao 2008-4-3 11:37 AM

nice::kuangma

captor 2008-4-3 11:43 AM

:guzhang

dongdongfish 2008-4-3 11:59 AM

zan

marthanovera 2008-4-3 01:36 PM

前两天在他们网站上回复过别人的评论<br>我今天再写给校报<img src="./images/smilies/default/smile.gif" smilieid="1" border="0">

[[i] 本帖最后由 marthanovera 于 2008-4-3 02:38 PM 编辑 [/i]]

longtan 2008-4-3 01:59 PM

厉害啊~~~

bbcat 2008-4-3 03:14 PM

<img smilieid="73" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/yangcongtou/minjie.gif" border="0"><br>

zuri 2008-4-3 03:20 PM

well, my intial response to the western media propoganda on the Tibet issue was as furious as yours, I basically hate people pointing fingers without facts, or worse yet, with bad facts.<br><br>then I thought again, what the hell, I said to my myself, what about the China media controlled by the communist party's iron grip? And what about the way the government treats/abuses its own people? Haven't they executed enough ever since they took power in 1949? They turned the country up side down and 50 years later, the leaders and their descendents ended up being on top of the food chain, isn't that ridiculous?<br><br>Chinese people is the best of people in the world. But the communist regime in China is the worst of worst.<br><br>at the end of the day, I am cool.<br><br><br><br>[quote]原帖由 <i>马甲</i> 于 2008-4-3 12:32 PM 发表 <a href="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/redirect.php?goto=findpost&amp;pid=127482&amp;ptid=10390" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/common/back.gif" alt="" border="0"></a>
谢谢这些朋友的努力。大家加油写,团结起来声音大。From aaaaDear Editor: I was and am very very upset to read the article about
Tibetan situation in yesterday's daily collegian. As far as I know, the
s ... [/quote]

LupinIII 2008-4-3 03:37 PM

:xinku :ding:

gao331 2008-4-3 07:02 PM

Your points are well taken. Nonetheless, I suppose we shall not mix orange and apple, right? The fact(let's suppose it is true) that CCP is bad doesn't mean it is always wrong/bad, right? We(at least I) aren't with the Gov/CCP on every issue&nbsp;  and it has to be looked at case by case. For some, we take a stand while the others we give a laugh and let it go.&nbsp; BTW, as for whether the CCP is the worst of the worst, as far as I am thinking, it is a debateable question but bear some true element there, what do you think? Any party or country/Gov you could think of is not bad or evil in one way or another?....and what would be your solution to China(let's say we can get rid of CCP tomorrow)? <br><br>[quote]原帖由 <i>zuri</i> 于 2008-4-3 04:20 PM 发表 <a href="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/redirect.php?goto=findpost&amp;pid=127506&amp;ptid=10390" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/common/back.gif" alt="" border="0"></a>
well, my intial response to the western media propoganda on the Tibet issue was as furious as yours, I basically hate people pointing fingers without facts, or worse yet, with bad facts.then I thought ... [/quote]

timothy 2008-4-3 10:54 PM

好耶好耶!:guzhang :guzhang ::minjie

zoe 2008-4-3 10:57 PM

zan~

bigdog 2008-4-3 11:08 PM

:ding2:
声援!

kknd 2008-4-3 11:28 PM

Well said. <img smilieid="44" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/default/00000335.gif" border="0"><img smilieid="44" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/smilies/default/00000335.gif" border="0"><br><br>[quote]原帖由 <i>gao331</i> 于 2008-4-3 08:02 PM 发表 <a href="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/redirect.php?goto=findpost&amp;pid=127524&amp;ptid=10390" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/common/back.gif" alt="" border="0"></a>
Your points are well taken. Nonetheless, I suppose we shall not mix orange and apple, right? The fact(let's suppose it is true) that CCP is bad doesn't mean it is always wrong/bad, right? We(at least  ... [/quote]

KaiserLeave 2008-4-3 11:38 PM

支持~

soar 2008-4-4 12:23 AM

<P>最近忙,还没能去找文章和三封email</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>可以了解一下文章和email的处理手法,出现位置吗?</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>注意报道的倾向性处理手法。出现位置,字体大小等都是一个很强烈的信号。一般重视的话,后续的email应该在更醒目位置,并且从中提炼出一个题目来。但我感觉这些email很可能是在读者反馈的地方出现,一般不太会被注意到。</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>如果校报坚持倾向性报道处理,我觉得游行或者展板展示是必要的。我们的声音要更加宏亮,不能吃这个哑巴亏。</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>建议投稿,把观点集中起来,起个响亮有力的题目,email可能只是作为读者来信反馈的形式,只在不重要位置出现。</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>

soar 2008-4-4 12:33 AM

特别建议:反驳西方藏独有点被动,务必如下进行反击

信源:国际风云|编辑:2008-04-03| 网址:[url]http://www.popyard.org[/url]      抄送朋友|打印保留  

八阕 [url]http://www.popyard.org[/url] 【八阕】一些同胞把反驳西方同事同学藏独事情登在网上,我看之后,感觉偏于被动,如果只是对方提出指责,我们辩解,有点象审判.总是被动挨打的感觉.特提点建议,有力有礼的反驳对手.
对德国人:要直接往衲粹上扯,衲粹和西藏有密切关系,当年希特勒对西藏有特殊兴趣,和他的种族主义观点有密切联系.这是德国的软勒.要毫不留情的捅上去.笑眯眯地告诉他,你理解德国对西藏的关心,再解释一下"历史渊源".和德国文化再拉拉勾,那样就不是你辩解,你可以微笑着看德国人满头大汗地解释.

对英国人: 要往贩卖黑奴,种族清洗,殖民历史上扯,直接告诉他,英国人没有资格谈西藏人权,因为奴隶贩子殖民帝国后代谈民族压迫.很滑稽.

对美国人: 要笑眯眯地告诉他,中国人没有想他们那样种族灭绝印第按人,所以才有西藏问题,我们没有美国那么文明,要向他们学习.特别是留几个印第按人活口建保留地,展示人权.

对法国人: 要和他们谈殖民历史,谈西嘉岛独立,特别是因种族歧视引起的城市暴乱问题.这次法国内政部长对此问题的态度,说明他是法国人的软肋,要无情地狠狠得划一刀,再撒盐.

总的感觉就是,咱们不能被动辩解,要主动出击,对西方历史的现实的问题来个总暴露,他打他的,我打我的.不要跟着他转.抢回主动权.

marthanovera 2008-4-4 01:24 AM

发了
顺便还针砭时弊了一下对美国现状的看法-.-
结尾加了一句如果选登我的回复,请不要断章取义随便加粗字体
哈哈

vivianus 2008-4-5 12:29 AM

<P>顶!</P>
<P>看见新闻上歪曲的报道,本来就挺气愤,相信在国外的师兄师姐们更有别样的体会了……祖国强大才是硬道理啊~</P>

imac 2008-4-8 02:23 PM

<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Chinese media is much less controlled than the western side.&nbsp;If you want to argue, you better come up with a little bit of credit or facts&nbsp;to show you know&nbsp;anything about controlling media instead of being brain-washed here as those tibet-freers.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>I&nbsp;have&nbsp;some friends in&nbsp;Hunan Sat. TV in management positions,&nbsp; and had asked them about&nbsp;what the regulation process is. It is much much much less biased and oriented than the&nbsp; CNN / Fox / CBS etc. Yes, they do need to be quiet on some issues, but they are much netural in most things that they could say. It is way better than carefully and intentionally fabricating stories to&nbsp;"train" people. </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>At least you can observe, here we have several hundreds of students and scholars, how many of them are believing communism without reasons and facts? And for the democratic captalism followers, how many of them knows what&nbsp;are democracy and captalism? Or they just being "trained" to believe: these are good and those are evil. You can see with your own eyes&nbsp;and tell, which population is being brain washed. Westerners or us Chinese. </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Straight to the point, worst of the worst&nbsp;CCP made a 29 years' straight GDP growth ranging 9-15% while the god blessed democratic capitalism would celebrate if&nbsp;it goes around 3-4%. China is now the 3rd larget economy entity in the world. Well, how do you define "worst of the worst" is kinda interesting.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Hi, buddy, before you stick with the democracy fantasy and freedom dreams, try review a bit what they are, ok? It is really weird to say "this is good because God says it's good".&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>I personally would recommend "social choice theory" which proves (yes, mathematically)&nbsp;why democracy is&nbsp;only a toxic pacifier and&nbsp;why&nbsp;freedom should be different in different places. (Geese, please don't argue with "everyone should have xxx yyy and zzz").</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>[quote]原帖由 <I>zuri</I> 于 2008-4-3 04:20 PM 发表 <A href="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/redirect.php?goto=findpost&amp;pid=127506&amp;ptid=10390" target=_blank><IMG alt="" src="http://www.umasscssa.org/forum/images/common/back.gif" border=0></A> well, my intial response to the western media propoganda on the Tibet issue was as furious as yours, I basically hate people pointing fingers without facts, or worse yet, with bad facts.then I thought ... [/quote]</P>

[[i] 本帖最后由 imac 于 2008-4-8 05:52 PM 编辑 [/i]]
页: [1] 2
查看完整版本: 三封抗议的email已经登到校报上了。