好耶好耶！

zan~

声援！

Well said.

引用:

原帖由 gao331 于 2008-4-3 08:02 PM 发表
Your points are well taken. Nonetheless, I suppose we shall not mix orange and apple, right? The fact(let's suppose it is true) that CCP is bad doesn't mean it is always wrong/bad, right? We(at least ...

支持~

最近忙，还没能去找文章和三封email

 

可以了解一下文章和email的处理手法，出现位置吗？

 

注意报道的倾向性处理手法。出现位置，字体大小等都是一个很强烈的信号。一般重视的话，后续的email应该在更醒目位置，并且从中提炼出一个题目来。但我感觉这些email很可能是在读者反馈的地方出现，一般不太会被注意到。

 

如果校报坚持倾向性报道处理，我觉得游行或者展板展示是必要的。我们的声音要更加宏亮，不能吃这个哑巴亏。

 

建议投稿，把观点集中起来，起个响亮有力的题目，email可能只是作为读者来信反馈的形式，只在不重要位置出现。

 

 

特别建议：反驳西方藏独有点被动，务必如下进行反击

信源：国际风云｜编辑：2008-04-03｜ 网址：http://www.popyard.org 抄送朋友｜打印保留

八阕 http://www.popyard.org 【八阕】一些同胞把反驳西方同事同学藏独事情登在网上,我看之后,感觉偏于被动,如果只是对方提出指责,我们辩解,有点象审判.总是被动挨打的感觉.特提点建议,有力有礼的反驳对手.
对德国人:要直接往衲粹上扯,衲粹和西藏有密切关系,当年希特勒对西藏有特殊兴趣,和他的种族主义观点有密切联系.这是德国的软勒.要毫不留情的捅上去.笑眯眯地告诉他,你理解德国对西藏的关心,再解释一下"历史渊源".和德国文化再拉拉勾,那样就不是你辩解,你可以微笑着看德国人满头大汗地解释.

对英国人: 要往贩卖黑奴,种族清洗,殖民历史上扯,直接告诉他,英国人没有资格谈西藏人权,因为奴隶贩子殖民帝国后代谈民族压迫.很滑稽.

对美国人: 要笑眯眯地告诉他,中国人没有想他们那样种族灭绝印第按人,所以才有西藏问题,我们没有美国那么文明,要向他们学习.特别是留几个印第按人活口建保留地,展示人权.

对法国人: 要和他们谈殖民历史,谈西嘉岛独立,特别是因种族歧视引起的城市暴乱问题.这次法国内政部长对此问题的态度,说明他是法国人的软肋,要无情地狠狠得划一刀,再撒盐.

总的感觉就是,咱们不能被动辩解,要主动出击,对西方历史的现实的问题来个总暴露,他打他的,我打我的.不要跟着他转.抢回主动权.

发了
顺便还针砭时弊了一下对美国现状的看法-.-
结尾加了一句如果选登我的回复,请不要断章取义随便加粗字体
哈哈

顶！

看见新闻上歪曲的报道，本来就挺气愤，相信在国外的师兄师姐们更有别样的体会了……祖国强大才是硬道理啊~

 

Chinese media is much less controlled than the western side. If you want to argue, you better come up with a little bit of credit or facts to show you know anything about controlling media instead of being brain-washed here as those tibet-freers.

 

I have some friends in Hunan Sat. TV in management positions,  and had asked them about what the regulation process is. It is much much much less biased and oriented than the  CNN / Fox / CBS etc. Yes, they do need to be quiet on some issues, but they are much netural in most things that they could say. It is way better than carefully and intentionally fabricating stories to "train" people.

 

At least you can observe, here we have several hundreds of students and scholars, how many of them are believing communism without reasons and facts? And for the democratic captalism followers, how many of them knows what are democracy and captalism? Or they just being "trained" to believe: these are good and those are evil. You can see with your own eyes and tell, which population is being brain washed. Westerners or us Chinese.

 

Straight to the point, worst of the worst CCP made a 29 years' straight GDP growth ranging 9-15% while the god blessed democratic capitalism would celebrate if it goes around 3-4%. China is now the 3rd larget economy entity in the world. Well, how do you define "worst of the worst" is kinda interesting.

 

Hi, buddy, before you stick with the democracy fantasy and freedom dreams, try review a bit what they are, ok? It is really weird to say "this is good because God says it's good". 

 

I personally would recommend "social choice theory" which proves (yes, mathematically) why democracy is only a toxic pacifier and why freedom should be different in different places. (Geese, please don't argue with "everyone should have xxx yyy and zzz").

 

引用:

原帖由 zuri 于 2008-4-3 04:20 PM 发表 well, my intial response to the western media propoganda on the Tibet issue was as furious as yours, I basically hate people pointing fingers without facts, or worse yet, with bad facts.then I thought ...

[ 本帖最后由 imac 于 2008-4-8 05:52 PM 编辑 ]